Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: It returns 0 to indicate that no more bytes are available because the end of file has been reached
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
C programming distinguishes between high level standard I O functions, such as getchar or fgetc, and low level system calls like read. Many learners confuse their return conventions. This question focuses on the POSIX style read function, which operates on file descriptors and returns a count of bytes read. Understanding its behavior at end of file is essential for writing correct file handling loops.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The read function has three main outcomes. On success, it returns a nonnegative value equal to the number of bytes read. If an error occurs, it returns -1 and sets errno to an appropriate error code. When end of file is reached before any bytes are read, read returns 0. This convention allows programs to distinguish between an error and a clean end of file condition and is different from the EOF macro used by functions like fgetc.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Consider a loop that calls read repeatedly until no more data is available.
As long as the file has data, read returns a positive number showing how many bytes were placed in the buffer.
When the file position reaches the end and there are no bytes left to read, a subsequent call to read does not fill the buffer.
In this situation, read returns 0 to signal that end of file has been reached and that no more bytes can be read.
If read encounters an error instead, it returns -1 and sets errno, which is different from the end of file case.
Verification / Alternative check:
Example code in POSIX documentation often shows loops that check for the result of read and break when it returns 0, treating that as the normal termination of a file processing loop. This confirms that 0 indicates end of file rather than an error.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option b confuses read with high level functions like fgetc, which use EOF as a symbolic negative value to represent both end of file and some errors.
Option c suggesting a final value of 1 has no special meaning; smaller positive counts can occur anywhere, not only at end of file.
Option d is incorrect because read has well defined return semantics specified by the operating system interface, not compiler dependent behavior.
Common Pitfalls:
A frequent mistake is to test for end of file by comparing the return value of read to EOF instead of 0, which leads to incorrect logic. Another pitfall is ignoring the difference between system level read and buffered standard library calls. Always remember that read returns byte counts, with 0 used specifically to signal that no more data is available.
Final Answer:
When read reaches the end of a file, it returns 0 to indicate that no more bytes are available and that the calling code has reached the end of file.
Discussion & Comments