Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Q is T's son
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This reasoning question asks you to identify which one of the given statements cannot be definitely concluded from the information provided. It is not about which statement is impossible, but rather which statement is not guaranteed to be true in every valid family arrangement consistent with the given clues. Understanding the difference between “possible” and “definitely true” is the key here.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
First, we interpret “brother of Q and R” in the usual exam sense: P, Q and R are children of the same parents S (mother) and T (father). Then we check each option to see whether it must follow in all such cases or whether, in at least one consistent interpretation, it might fail. The subtle point is about the gender of Q, which is not specified.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Consider two possible family configurations consistent with the clues. In one, Q is male; then the statement “Q is T's son” is true. In another, Q is female; then the statement becomes false and the correct description would be “Q is T's daughter”. Since both configurations are consistent with the question stem, the statement about Q being T's son is not definitely true.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Each of the other three options follows directly from the standard assumption that P, Q and R are full siblings with common parents S and T. There is no scenario under that convention in which T is not Q's father, S is not P's mother, or P is not S's son.
Common Pitfalls:
Many students mistakenly look for logical impossibility instead of “not definitely true”. Others overlook unspecified gender and assume that every child mentioned without a label is male. Always pay close attention to which individuals have clearly stated genders (like “brother”) and which do not.
Final Answer:
The statement that cannot be definitely true is “Q is T's son.”
Discussion & Comments