Verification of truth — always-with relationship: Which of the following is always associated with a bargain?

Introduction / Context:
“Bargain” refers to a negotiated transaction. The question seeks the element that must always be present whenever a bargain occurs.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• A bargain involves parties agreeing to give something and receive something in return—price concessions, terms, or items.
• Stylistic or subjective qualities (eloquence, sumptuousness, triviality) are not essential to the act itself.

Concept / Approach:
Identify the invariant: an act of exchange (goods-for-money, goods-for-goods, or services-for-consideration) under negotiated terms. Without exchange, there is no bargain.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Any practical example of bargaining—market haggling, contract negotiation—culminates in an exchange of consideration.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Sumptuousness: Luxury is unrelated to the bargaining act.
• Triviality: Value can be high or low; not required.
• Eloquence: Negotiation may be persuasive or terse; eloquence is optional.
• None of these: Incorrect because “Exchange” is essential.

Common Pitfalls:

• Confusing persuasive style with the core mechanics of bargaining.

Final Answer:

Exchange