Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: handle the contingency when a file gets corrupted
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Backups and recovery plans are core controls in information governance, ensuring business continuity after failures, corruption, or inadvertent deletion. Distinguishing the primary purpose from ancillary benefits keeps policies aligned with risk mitigation.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The primary purpose is restoration after data loss or corruption. Redundancy (multiple copies) is a means to that end, not the end itself. Version history may be a by-product (via snapshots or versioned backups), but the overarching objective is to recover operations to a known-good state within acceptable Recovery Point Objective (RPO) and Recovery Time Objective (RTO).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Business continuity and disaster recovery frameworks define backup success by meeting RPO/RTO after incidents, not by the mere existence of extra copies or versions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming “we have copies” equals resilience; neglecting tested restore procedures; ignoring offsite/immutable backups for ransomware resilience.
Final Answer:
handle the contingency when a file gets corrupted
Discussion & Comments