Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 2x = y + z
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question is about the relationship between the overall average of a set of numbers and the averages of two equal sized subgroups within that set. It is a simple algebraic problem that tests whether you can convert verbal statements about averages into equations using sums and then derive the correct relationship between x, y and z.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Average is defined as total sum divided by number of items. If the average of 6 numbers is x, then their total sum is 6x. If the average of one group of 3 numbers is y, then the sum of those 3 numbers is 3y. Similarly, the sum of the remaining 3 numbers is 3z. Since the 6 numbers consist exactly of these two subgroups, the total sum 6x must equal 3y + 3z. We then simplify this equation to get a direct relation between x, y and z.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Let S be the total sum of all 6 numbers.
Step 2: Given that the average of 6 numbers is x, we have S = 6x.
Step 3: Sum of the first group of 3 numbers = 3y because their average is y.
Step 4: Sum of the second group of 3 numbers = 3z because their average is z.
Step 5: These two groups together make up all 6 numbers, so S = 3y + 3z.
Step 6: Equate the two expressions for S: 6x = 3y + 3z.
Step 7: Divide both sides by 3 to simplify: 2x = y + z.
Step 8: Therefore, the correct relationship is 2x = y + z.
Verification / Alternative check:
Take a numerical example. Suppose the three numbers in the first group are 1, 2 and 3, and the three numbers in the second group are 7, 8 and 9. Then y = (1 + 2 + 3) / 3 = 2 and z = (7 + 8 + 9) / 3 = 8. The overall average x is (1 + 2 + 3 + 7 + 8 + 9) / 6 = 30 / 6 = 5. Now compute y + z = 2 + 8 = 10, and 2x = 2 * 5 = 10. Since 2x equals y + z for this example, this supports the derived relationship.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
The equation x = y + z would suggest the overall average is larger than each subgroup average, which conflicts with the numeric example and the derived formula. The expression 3x = 2y - 2z has the wrong structure and can be rejected by substitution into a simple numeric case. The option x = (y + z) / 3 treats the overall average as a third of the average of the subgroup averages, which makes no sense dimensionally. The option 'none of these' is incorrect because we have found a specific correct relationship.
Common Pitfalls:
Some students mistakenly average y and z directly, writing x = (y + z) / 2, forgetting that x is the average over all 6 numbers, not just a simple mean of the subgroup averages. Others confuse sum and average and write equations like 6x = y + z, which ignore the fact that y and z are averages, not totals. Always remember that sum = average * number of items, and ensure that you use sums when combining groups.
Final Answer:
The correct relationship between the averages is 2x = y + z.
Discussion & Comments