Firm CAD Practice — Dimension Placement Are architectural drafters generally expected to place dimensions according to the firm's established CAD standards, including dimension style, units, placement rules, and readability guidelines?

Introduction / Context:
Consistency across drawing sets is essential for coordination and construction. Firms document CAD practices in a standards manual and enforce them through templates, training, and reviews. This question asks whether architectural drafters are usually expected to place dimensions according to those established standards.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Firms maintain CAD templates with dimension styles and layers.
• Projects involve multiple team members and consultants.
• Readable, consistent dimensioning reduces field errors.

Concept / Approach:
Following a firm standard ensures that dimension text height, arrowheads or ticks, units, tolerance notation, and placement rules are uniform across sheets and across projects. This uniformity allows stakeholders to find information quickly and reduces misinterpretation caused by personal preferences.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Load the firm template and use prescribed dimension styles.2) Place dimensions according to spacing, baseline, and chaining rules.3) Keep orientation readable from bottom and right.4) Run sheet checks before issue to confirm compliance.

Verification / Alternative check:
Quality control checklists and peer reviews identify deviations quickly. Fewer RFIs after issue indicate that standardized dimensioning improves clarity.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Incorrect contradicts common practice. Personal style undermines consistency. Only senior staff and Only on final issue sets fail to recognize that standards apply at all stages and to all contributors.

Common Pitfalls:
Overriding styles locally; mixing units within a sheet; allowing crowding that reduces legibility.

Final Answer:
Correct