Introduction / Context:
High-level languages (HLLs) increase productivity by abstracting hardware details, enabling faster development and maintenance. This question checks whether you recognize the common advantages of HLLs over assembly or machine code.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Comparison is against low-level programming.
- Focus on productivity, maintainability, and portability.
- Modern toolchains and IDEs are available.
Concept / Approach:
- HLLs reduce cognitive load with higher abstractions and strong tooling.
- Portability and documentation facilities improve collaboration and longevity.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Option A: Teams often shrink and onboarding accelerates due to simpler syntax and libraries.Option B: IDEs, static analysis, and structured syntax improve debugging and documentation.Option C: Compilers/VMs target many architectures, enhancing machine independence.Therefore, all are true → choose “All of the above”.
Verification / Alternative check:
Survey of software engineering practices shows HLLs dominate for business and scientific apps due to these benefits.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Each individual statement is true, so selecting any one misses the complete picture.
- None of the above: Incorrect because all listed advantages are valid.
Common Pitfalls:
- Equating performance optimization with productivity; HLLs can still be efficient via compilers/FFI.
Final Answer:
All of the above
Discussion & Comments