Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Corrosion resistance of aluminium alloys depends strongly on alloying additions and microstructure. Designers must know which elements hurt or help passivity (oxide stability) to choose the right alloy for marine, architectural, and chemical environments. The role of manganese (Mn) is often misunderstood compared with elements like magnesium, silicon, copper, zinc, and chromium.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Manganese is primarily a strength and workability modifier; it forms dispersoids that control recrystallization and can tie up iron as intermetallics, refining grain structure. Its direct effect on corrosion is minor and not broadly “improving.” In contrast, copper additions generally reduce corrosion resistance; magnesium and silicon (as Mg2Si in 6xxx) offer good corrosion-mechanical balance; chromium and zirconium can refine grain structure and sometimes improve resistance. Therefore a blanket claim that Mn improves corrosion resistance is inaccurate.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Datasheets for 3xxx series (Al–Mn) show corrosion performance similar to commercially pure aluminium, with the main benefits being formability and moderate strength; there is no universal increase in corrosion resistance solely due to Mn.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming any third element that refines structure automatically improves corrosion; ignoring the dominant negative role of copper in many Al alloys.
Final Answer:
Discussion & Comments