Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: ₹378
Explanation:
Introduction:
This question tests area calculation after reducing dimensions due to margins. The mat does not cover the entire floor; it leaves a uniform gap from the walls. That means both length and breadth of the usable mat area reduce by twice the margin (once on each opposite side). After finding the mat’s area, multiplying by the cost per square foot gives the total cost. This is a direct, single-formula aptitude problem, but it checks attention to detail: many mistakes happen when people subtract the margin only once instead of twice.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Mat length = 15 - 2*1.5 and mat breadth = 12 - 2*1.5. Then mat area = length * breadth. Finally cost = area * rate. The key idea is “uniform border on all sides” means the reduction happens twice per dimension.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Mat length = 15 - 2*1.5 = 15 - 3 = 12 ftMat breadth = 12 - 2*1.5 = 12 - 3 = 9 ftMat area = 12 * 9 = 108 sq ftCost = 108 * 3.50 = 378
Verification / Alternative Check:
Check the border logic: leaving 1.5 ft on left and 1.5 ft on right consumes 3 ft of total length. Similarly, leaving 1.5 ft on top and bottom consumes 3 ft of total breadth. So 12 ft by 9 ft is consistent. Multiplying 108 by ₹3.50 is also straightforward: 108*3 = 324 and 108*0.5 = 54, total 378.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
₹472.50 or ₹496: usually from using wrong mat dimensions or wrong multiplication.₹630: often from taking full room area 15*12 = 180 and multiplying by 3.5.₹405: comes from subtracting margin only once in one dimension.
Common Pitfalls:
Subtracting 1.5 only once instead of twice from length/breadth.Using room area instead of mat area.Mixing up “per sq ft” with “per ft”.Arithmetic error in 108 * 3.50.
Final Answer:
₹378
Discussion & Comments