That more emphasis should be laid on productivity areas instead of sciences does not mean that the country has achieved sufficient progress in sciences. But it implies that productivity factor was previously being neglected. So, II follows while I does not.
2. Statements: If all players play to their full potential, we will win the match. We have won the match.
Conclusions:
All players played to their full potential.
Some players did not play to their full potential.
The statement asserts that match can be won only if all the players play to their full potential. So, only I follows while II does not.
3. Statements: The Bank of England's move to auction 25 metric tons of gold drew plenty of bidders looking for a bargain, but was criticised by major gold producers worldwide.
Conclusions:
The Bank of England should not auction gold which it possesses to keep steady international prices of gold.
Bidders should quote higher gold prices to retain present value of gold in the international markets.
The statement does not talk against the auction but only speaks of the response it received from the bidders and gold producers. So, I does not follow. The phrase 'plenty of bidders looking for a bargain' is quite contrary to II. So, II also does not follow.
4. Statements: Good voice is a natural gift but one has to keep practising to improve and excel well in the field of music.
Conclusions:
Natural gifts need nurturing and care.
Even though your voice is not good, one can keep practising.
Clearly, both I and II correctly explain the given statement. So, both follow.
7. Statements: The President of XYZ Party indicated that 25 independent Members of Legislative Assembly (MLA) are seriously considering various options of joining some political party. But in any case all of them collectively will join one party only.
Conclusions:
The 25 independent MLAs will join XYZ party in a short period of time.
The 25 independent MLAs will join some other political party in a short period of time.
The statement is a symbolic one and only II correctly explains it.
9. Statements: Company X has a record of manufacturing cameras of quality and the latest design so that you do not spoil even a single shot irrespective of the weather conditions.
Conclusions:
No other company except X is reputed in the camera industry.
Clearly, the statement talks of Company X only and no other company. So, I does not follow. Also, it is mentioned that one can take a good shot even in bad weather conditions with a camera of Company X. So, II follows.
10. Statements: India's economy is depending mainly on forests.
Conclusions:
Trees should be preserved to improve Indian economy.
India wants only maintenance of forests to improve economic conditions.
It is mentioned in the statement that India's economy depends mainly on forests. This means that forests should be preserved. So, I follows. But, that only preservation of forests can improve the economy, cannot be said. So, II does not follow.