Arguments:

1. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.
2. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.

Arguments:

1. No. It is a wasteful practice.
2. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.

Arguments:

1. Yes. Goodwill always pays dividend.
2. No. Our generous behaviour and goodwill will be considered as our weakness.

Arguments:

1. Yes. Writers influence the thinking of the people.
2. No. With the help of physical force one can conquer all.

Arguments:

1. Yes. This leads to indiscriminate female foeticide and eventually will lead to social imbalance.
2. No. People have a right to know about their unborn child.

Arguments:

1. No. Such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country.
2. Yes. It is democracy - let people decide whom to vote.

Arguments:

1. No. Certain circumstances may have compelled them to take bribe.
2. Yes. They should do the job they are entrusted with, honestly.

Arguments:

1. No. The pests will destroy all the crops and the farmers will have nothing to harvest.
2. Yes. The chemical pesticides used in agriculture pollute the water underground and this has become a serious health hazard.

Arguments:

1. Yes. It is very much necessary to do so to restore ecological balance.
2. No. A total ban would harm timber based industries.

Arguments:

1. No. Any Indian citizen has a basic right to stay at any place of his/her choice and hence they cannot be stopped.
2. Yes. This is the way to effect an equitable distribution of resources across the states in India.