clearly argument 1 holds strong,while argument 2 is vague
Clearly, independent judiciary is necessary for impartial judgements so that the executive does'nt take wrong measures.So only argument 1 holds
Clearly.India need to maintain military force inorder to defend itself againsts the threats of other military powers in the world.So,none of the arguments holds strong
Clearly ,indulgement in politics trains the students for future leader ship but it sways them from studies .So,either of argument 1 or 2 holds
Government jobs in rural are underlined with several difficulties in love of these .In lieu of these ,extra incentives are needed
Import of sugar is directly related with the domestic production of sugar. If import of sugar is banned then it will result in hoarding of sugar besides increase in its prices (due to less supply than the requirement). Hence I is strong. Note that availability of a commodity keeps the prices of the commodity under control. Hence, II is strong.
I is strong because an obsession with such contents creates a bad impact on their impressionable minds. II is strong because in today's age one can't afford to lose access to information
I is weak because reduction of workload of IT officials is not too desirable a motive. II is strong because reduced tax collection will have a bad impact on state activities.
The last sentence in the paragraph clearly gives support for the idea that the interest in Shakespeare is due to the development of his characters. Choice a is incorrect because the writer never makes this type of comparison. Choice c is wrong because even though scholars are mentioned in the paragraph, there is no indication that the scholars are compiling the anthology. Choice d is wrong because there is no support to show that most New Yorkers are interested in this work. There is no support for choice e either.
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.