Since sum is 360 hence P + Q + R + S = 360
From statement I alone we will get P = (Q + R + S)/3 from this we can find the value of P hence statement I alone is sufficient enough.
From statement II alone we can not find the value of P.

Let the 7 consecutive whole numbers be (n ± 3), (n ± 2), (n ± 1), n.
Now i we consider Statement I alone
Product of these 7 integers = 702800
Since 702800 = 2⁴ 5² (251)(7), it cannot be the product of 7 consecutive whole numbers. Hence I alone is insufficient.
Now if we consider Statement II alone
Given that their sum = 105 = 7n or n = 15 and then 7 consecutive integers are 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 So, II alone is sufficient.

If we look at Statement I
It is given that the circle are concentric. But nothing is given about their dimensions. Hence I alone is not sufficient.
In statement II ratio of area is given hence we can find the required ratio.

If we look at Statement I
i = p - 17 and r = p - 103
Hence, we cannot ind how many each received so this statement is not sufficient enough.
Now by considering Statement II alone.
p + i + r = 170
Hence, we cannot find how many each received. so, this statement is not sufficient enough.
Using I sand II together, we get the value of p and the value of q and r.

If we look at statement I then we will get
If a = 3 and b = 2, a + b > 0. Here b > 0
If a = 3 and b = -2, a + b > 0. Here b < 0
Hence I alone is not sufficient.
Now if we look at Statement II only then we will get
if a = 3 and b 2, a - b > 0. Here b > 0
If a = 3 and b = -2, a - b > 0. Here b < 0
Hence II alone is not sufficient.
Now by using statements I and II together
If a = 3 and b = 2, a - b > 0 and a + b > 0. Here b > 0
If a = 3 and b = -2, a - b > 0. and a + b > 0. Here b < 0.
Hence I and II together are also insufficient.

Consider Statement I alone
Given that Area (?ABC) = Area(?PQR) since nothing about the sides or angles is mentioned, we can not say if they are congruent.Hence, I alone is not sufficient.
Consider Statement II alone
?ABC and ?PQR are right triangles. Nothing about the sides is given, Hence, II alone is not sufficient. Now using both I and II
Now we have two right angled triangle k with same area we may have different combination as only product of base and height is same. Hence even by using both the statement we can not find the answer.

Given that their salaries are in the ratio of 3:4 and expenditure is in the ratio of 4:5 hence we can assume that salary of A and B are 3x and 4x and their expenditures are 4y and 5y.
Now we need to find the ratio of (3x - 4y)/(4x - 5y)
Consider statement I alone:
Giving of B is 25% of his salary hence his expenditure must be 75% so 3/4(4x) = 5y or 3x = 5y from this we can find the required ratio hence this statement is sufficient.
Consider statement II alone :
Given that 4x = 2000 or x = 500 but from this we can not find the value of y and hence we can not find the ratio of their savings.

Let x be the average height of the class and n be the number of students in the class.
Consider statements I alone
xn - 56 = (x + 1)(x -1)
? x + n = 57 .............(i)
Hence, the value of x cannot be found. So, I alone is not sufficient.
Consider statement I alone:
xn - 42 = (x + 1)(n - 1)
? x - n = 41 .............(ii)
Hence, the value of x cannot be found. So, II alone is not sufficient.
Both the statements together are suficient as the value of x can be found by solving (i) and (ii)

Given that Ram > Shyam, Vikram > Jay.
Hence from this we can conclude that neither Ram nor Vikram is the shortest. And we have to find the shortest. And we have to find the shortest among them:
Consider statement alone:
We know that that Ram is not the shortest, either Shyam or Jay is the shortest.
Hence (I) alone is not sufficient.
Consider statement I alone Shyam > Vikram.
From the given information and the information in (II), we get Ram > Shyam > Vikram > Jay.
Hence, (II) alone is sufficient.

Given relationship is (PQ)(RQ) = XXX
Since X can take 9 values from 1 to 9 hence we have 9 possibilities
111 = 3 x 37 444 = 12 x 37 777 = 21 x 37
222 = 6 x 37 555 = 15 x 37 888 = 24 x 37
333 = 9 x 37 666 = 18 x 18 999 = 27 x 37
But out of these 9 cases only in 999, we get the unit's digit of two numbers the same. Since it is a unique value, hence we need neither statement I nor statement II to answer the question.