Question: How is R related to M?

Statements:

1. M's brother is husband of P.
2. P is mother of R's sister.

From I, we conclude that there are 16 students and 11 boys taller than Shravan.

This implies that there are 5 girls taller than Shravan.

In II, Shravan's rank from the bottom is mentioned and to ascertain the number of girls taller than him, we need to know his rank from the top for which the number of students in the class is required, which is not given.

II reveals that the previous bus had left at 7.45 p.m. As given in I, the next bus would leave after 30 minutes i.e. at 8.15 p.m.

From I, We know that in a class of 25 students, Amit ranks 18th from the bottom and 8th from the top.

Sachin is three ranks above Amit and so, Sachin ranks 5th from the top.

From II, Deepti ranks 23rd from the bottom and hence, 3rd from the top. Sachin, being 2 ranks below Deepti, is, thus, 5th from the top.

From I, we have: N > M, N > P, D > N. Thus, we have: D > N > M > P or D>N> P>M.

But, from II, M earns more than P i.e. D > N > M > P. Also, since P earns less than K and N earns less than only D, so we have: D>N>K>M>P or D>N>M> K > P.

Hence, either K or M earns more than only the least earner i.e. P.

From I, we have: number of employees who opted for VRS = 18% of 950 + 6% of 1100 = 171 + 66 = 237.

From II, we cannot get the required answer until and unless the number of employees in age-group 51 to 56 and other age-groups is known.

From II, we know that N is K's son and K is B's grandfather. Thus, N is the son of B's grandfather i.e. N is either father or uncle of B.

From I, B is the daughter of M. So, M is either father or mother of B.

Clearly, the correct relationship between M and N cannot be deduced.

From II, we conclude that in a class of 40, Deepak ranks 23rd from the bottom i.e. 18th from the top.

From I and II, we find that Suman is 3 ranks below 18th rank from the top i.e. she ranks 21st from the top.

From II and III, we find that Suman is 3 ranks above 23rd rank from the bottom

i.e. she ranks 20th from the bottom or 21st from the top.

From I, the order is : E, B, C or C, B, E.

From II, the order is : E, B.

From III, the order is : A, D, E.

Combining the above three, we get the order as : A, D, E, B, C. Clearly, E is sitting in the middle.

Observing I, II and III, we find that similar letters have similar code symbols at the corresponding places in the code. So, this is direct-coding.

Thus, to find the code for DATE, we need the code for D which can be obtained from I only (i.e. $.) and the codes for A, T and E which can be obtained either from II or III (@, # and % respectively).

From II, we know that Copal's brother was born in 1982.

From III, we find that Gopal's brother was 8 years younger to him i.e. Gopal was born in 1974.

From I, we find that Sanjay is 6 years older than Gopal. Thus, Sanjay was born in 1968.