Statements:
common code words are 'Ne', 'Pa', ,'Lo'. So, 'Ne', 'Pa' and 'Lo' are codes for 'But', 'None' and 'And'. Thus, in the first statement, 'Sic' is the code for 'No'.
Only I and II are strong. Clearly, both I and II hold strong, as they provide very convincing reasons, for a single tax system would help get rid of multifarious taxes on a product. Besides, the idea of imitation of other countries in the implementation of a certain policy holds no relevance. So, argument III does not hold strong.
Cousin
Both I and II are strong. I is strong on the ground of 'utility' and II on 'humanity'.
Because he is assuming I that is why he has used the term 'enforceable' in his statement. Speaker is assuming II; that is why he stressed that law should be obeyed by all without exception.
In the given word and number arrangement machine rearranges the input with the logic that in step I, it shifts the largest number to the left most place and the last word coming in English alphabetical series to the right most place. In step II, it shifts the smallest number to the left most place and the next word (in reverse alphabetical order) to the right most. In step III 2nd largest number it shifts to the left most place and so on.
Input : fun 89 at the 28 16 base camp 35 53 here 68
Step I : 89 fun at 28 16 base camp 35 53 here 68 the
Step II : 16 89 at fun 28 base camp 35 53 68 the here
Step III : 68 16 89 at 28 base camp 35 53 the here fun
Step IV : 28 68 16 89 at base 35 53 the here fun camp
Step V : 53 28 68 16 89 at 35 the here fun camp base
Step VI : 35 53 28 68 16 89 the here fun camp base at
Meaningful order of words in ascending order :
c. Disease ? b. Doctor ? d. Diagnosis ? e. Medicine ? a. Cure
Split the word into two parts and append the first part at the end of second.
From question it is clear that we need to make 2 words from word APTITUDE where first word should have first 5 alphabets and remaining 3 alphabets will be part of 2nd word.
APTITUDE ? APTIT + UDE ? UDEAPTIT
So the code for APTITUDE is UDEAPTIT.
I is not strong because ''more emphasis'' on one aspect can't be interpreted as an insult to the other aspect. II does not carry any substance.
The use of 'only' in I makes it invalid. Also, it is the duty of the government to save its citizens from intakes of any harmful products, even if they like them. So, II does not hold strong. Besides, a product must not be banned unless ll its harmful effect have been proved. So, III hold strong. Lastly, we cannot blindly follow the decisions taken by other countries. So, IV also does not hold.
As, indefatigable means never giving up or getting tired of doing something and inveterate means always doing something or unlikely to stop.
similarly tireless means putting a lot of effort and energy to do something over a long period of time and habitual means doing something often and difficult to stop.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.