Therefore, on account of this, it is possible to increase the vegetable prices in the local market.
From above given matrices I and II , we get different values for word MASTER -
M ? 01, 10, 24, 33, 42
A ? 02, 11, 20, 34, 43
S ? 00, 14, 23, 32, 41
T ? 04, 13, 22, 31, 40
E ? 56, 65, 79, 88, 97
R ? 03, 12, 21, 30, 44, 57, 66, 75, 89, 98
As shown in given figure , all the values for word MASTER are matched in only option ( 1 ) for every letter . So , the set for the word MASTER will be 01, 43, 41, 04, 65, 44 .From matrix , option ( 1 ) is correct .
M + N ? M is the mother of N
N x Q ? N is the sister of Q
Therefore, P is the maternal uncle of Q.
Backward order letter positions are multiplied to get the second term.
TZW = 7 x 1 x 4 = 28
Similarly,
QYS = 10 x 2 x 8 = 160
Some pates are chairs + All chairs are tables = I + A = I = Some plates are tables ? conversion ? Some tables are plates(I). Hence I follows. Some bags are plates + Some plates are chairs = I + I = No conclusion Hence II and III do not follow. By combination. However, the two form a complementary E-I pair, Hence either I or III follows.
First and Last word is of same letters. Middle words are having opposite letters.
aaaaa/bbabb/aabaa/bbbbb
Hence, set aabbb come in gap respectively.
As, a 'Patient' goes to a 'Doctor' for medical help, similarly a 'Litigant goes to a 'Lawyer' for legal help.
As per given condition,
Arranging according to age,
Kamini is younger than Rupa.
1. K < R
Pooja is younger than Monika.
2. P < M
Rupa and Monika are of the same age.
3. R = M
Neelam is elder to Rupa.
4. N > R
From 1 and 2,
5. R = M >K or P
from 5 and 4,
6. N > R = M >K or P
Persons are arranged by Age
Neelm > Rupa = Monika > Pooja > Kamini
or Neelam > Rupa = Monika > Kamini > Pooja
Only Statement I is superfluous.
In all pairs except (d), first is a tool which works on second.
Nothing can be said about the volume of freight during the remaining period. So, Assumption I is not implicit in the statement. Secondly, it is given in the statement that fare has been increased in view of the possibility of incurring losses i.e., to meet the probable deficit. Hence, Assumption II is implicit in the statement.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.