So, 10 is wrong and must be replaced by 32 i.e. 9.
Here the assumption is: The method of governance of a country should be according to the ground realities of that country. Hence I is not implicit. II is not implicit because we don't know whether the speaker has other countries in mind.
From above given series ,
Firstly , we make the pairs of four letters in given series . Now putting the values of options one by one a specific order in blank position .
a a b b/ b b a a/ a a b b / b b a a.
Hence , required answer will be bbaa and the correct option is A .
Since availability of LPG is necessary, I is strong. Again, it is not adaptable to our existing type of engines, Hence II is also strong.
The given series is in the below pattern,
First term = 3
Second term = First term × 2.5
? Second term = 3 × 2.5 = 7.5 ;
Third term = Second term × 2
? Third term = 7.5 × 2 = 15 ;
Fourth term = Third term × 2.5
? Fourth term = 15 × 2.5 = 37.5 ;
Fifth term = Fourth term × 2
? Fifth term = 37.5 × 2 = 75 ;
Sixth term = Fifth term × 2.5
? Sixth term = 75 × 2.5 = 167.5; 167.5 is wrong. It should be 187.5.
Seventh term = Sixth term × 2
? Seventh term = 187.5 × 2 = 375 ;
Hence, 167.5 is wrong. It should be 187.5.
There are five tracks T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Chines ---Indian (Chinese is let o Indian)
Chinese Indian and the Iraqi Nepalese Iraqi/Indian Englishmen.
Hence the Indian and the Iraqi should be in track 2 and track 4 in any order.
I is not implicit because it assumes too many things: education and free movement are beyond the scope of the statement. II is not implicit because the PM only assumes that law and order affects the common man more than prices do.
Using the correct symbols, we have
18 Q 1 2 P 4 R 5 S 6
= 18 x 12 ÷ 4 + 5 - 6
= 18 x 3 + 5 - 6
= 54 + 5 - 6 = 59 - 6 = 53
I is weak because it is vague. II is strong because it is not a right way of arguing and is based on wrong assumption.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.