Conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II does not follows.
I follows because trees are a part of forest and India's economy depends mainly on forest. II is not correlated with the statement. So it does not follow.
Hence, Statement I follows.
Every single word is coded here like T ? X ,A ? E etc...
We have to use every word coded in TABLECLOTH in HOTEL as well.
H ? T
O ? I
T ? X
E ? A
L ? R
Assertion is correct but reason is false.
Second denotes the prominent activity of being without the first.
All others have only 2 factors with prime number.
26 = 2 x 13, 34 = 2 x 17, 72 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3,
46 = 2 x 23, 38 = 2 x 19
H is the mother of G
The pattern is the letters moves in cyclic order.
Some rivers are hills + No hill is taxi = I + E = O = Some rivers are not taxis Hence II does not follow. Again, Since O-type statements can't be combined, neither I nor III follows. But the two form a complementary E- I pair, Hence either I or III follows.
(e) is the right answer
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.