On interchanging - and /, we get the equation as
5 + 3 x 8 / 12 - 4 = 3
or 5 + 3 x (2/3) - 4 = 3
or 3 = 3, which is true.
None focuses on the real reason of unemployability.
Only Course of action I can follow as public awareness programme should be expanded immediately.
Both courses of action are suitable for pursuing.
Courses of action I would be a extreme step. Courses of action II is not within the Government's preview. Courses of action III is advisable when there is retrenchment on such a large scale.
To avoid such in mishappening, deploying police constables can be of help. Also, if people go in groups, then such incidents be avoid.
Going for I is an extreme action and should be resorted to only when the students fail to behave themselves after repeated warnings like the one given in II.
Action I and III will create another problems action II is the effective way to reduce the problem.
We should remember that the culprits are mere students. Going for II instead of I would make sense only if it is a repeated act.
Both statements can help the young pepole to acquire their responsibility.
I follows as a measure of caution. But II won't solve the problem: poor electrical fittings would wreak havoc wherever the market be.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.