From both the given statements, we find that the number of cards sold this year (2935 x 1.2) = 3522.
S0. both I and II together are required.
Clearly, from each of the statements, we find that the code for 'pant is either 'mit' or 'nee'.
So, none of them is sufficient to answer the question.
From both the statements together, we conclude that the price of the new car is Rs (25000 * 3) i.e. Rs 75000
So, Ronnie had to pay Rs (75000 - 25000) i.e. Its 50000.
Thus, both I and II are required
The present price of the mixer can he calculated from statement II as follows
Let the earlier price be Rs x.
Then, 10% of x = 220 or x = 2200. Present price = Rs (2200 + 220) = Rs 2420.
So, only II is needed.
From both the statements together, we find that Tarun's father has three children ? Tarun and his two sisters This means that Tarun has no brother.
So, both I and II are needed.
The information given in the three statements together is also not sufficient to answer the given question.
Comparing the information in the question with statement 1. we find that '2' and '9' are the codes for 'tie' and 'dip'. So, '7' represents 'button'.
Thus, I alone iS sufficient.
Again, comparing the information in the question with II, WO find that the common code number '7' stands for the common word 'button'.
Thus, II alone also is sufficient.
From statements I and II together, we can conclude only that either B is the sister or brother of A.
So, even from both the statements, the exact relation cannot be known.
According to Pradeep : 20,21 or 22...(1)
According to his brother : not 22....(2)
From (1)&(2), the birthday falls on February 20 or 21.
Clearly, each of the given statements shows that B is sitting opposite to C or B is the partner of C.
From II, we conclude that B is the brother-in law of M. So, even from both the statements, we can't find out who is the father of M
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.