The destruction of coffee plantation is restricted to Africa. Starbucks decision should be a result of changing consumer preferences.
We get the answer by constructing the phrase:
Because II therefore I.
Both the statements (A) and (B) are effects of some independent causes because the shops and offices in the locality were closed due to other causes.
Statement (B) is cause and statement (A) is its effects because on account of snapping of overhead electrical wire there was a result of disruption of train services.
Statement (B) is the cause and statement (A) is its effect because the people participated in the dinner on account of the invitation.
These both statements are independent causes.
The government wanted to increase the supply of pulses in order to bring down prices.
Because the interest rates were reduced, more people took housing loans.
Both the statements are unrelated, Visiting tramples and feeding devotees may cause respect but not honesty.
The emphasis is on 'vocational' skills.
We get the answer by constructing the phrase: Because I therefore II.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.