Both the statements (A) and (B) are effects of some independent causes because the shops and offices in the locality were closed due to other causes.
Statement (B) is cause and statement (A) is its effects because on account of snapping of overhead electrical wire there was a result of disruption of train services.
Statement (B) is the cause and statement (A) is its effect because the people participated in the dinner on account of the invitation.
These both statements are independent causes.
Both the statements (A) and (B) are effects of some common causes because the urge of government for the enroll and the decision to increase tuition fee, together are the effects of common causes.
The option (d) cannot be a cause. (option (a) is not a sufficient cause and option (b) is a vague sentence.
We get the answer by constructing the phrase:
Because II therefore I.
The destruction of coffee plantation is restricted to Africa. Starbucks decision should be a result of changing consumer preferences.
The government wanted to increase the supply of pulses in order to bring down prices.
Because the interest rates were reduced, more people took housing loans.
Both the statements are unrelated, Visiting tramples and feeding devotees may cause respect but not honesty.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.