Both conclusions I and II follow
Assumption II is implicit.
Both conclusion I and II follow.
Only I follows
Conclusion I does not follows.
Conclusion II follows.
It is possible that government hasn't adequate found for collecting data or the employees are unskilled. Hence II can't be concluded. The problem lies not with the collection of data, but with its Knowledge and analysis. Hence I does not follow.
The cause for the escape of the criminals could have been because of laxity on the pat of the policy. Since only schools were closed in the city, there is a high possibility of some other cause for it.
Both the statement are effect of the common cause of environmental damage.
The Prime minister's visit making the headlines could be because of the absence of any other important news (cause). The visit could be historic because of other reason, such as it being the prime minister's first visit or the signing of some important agreements.
The members sat on a dharna because they did not have any hopes that the government will fulfill their demands. Only the leaders were arrested because of fear of law and order problem.
Both are effects. If II were a cause, then migratory birds would have come to the lake.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.