I follows because people generally make such transformations keeping in mind the taste of the people. II does not follow because sweet may have lose their glory not because of sugar (in fact, chocolates are in vogue in spite of sugar content) but because of changing taste.
It is true that if calamities are''a regular event''. they must strike every few years. But floods are not the only calamity. The calamity may strike in the form of drought, earthquake, etc. Hence I does not follow. II does not follow because scientific expertise is not the only problem; the trouble may be with implementation.
I may or may not be true but II is obvious because of the last part of the statement.
I is not true because of the wording''....and no person who is entirely free from evil.'' II is obvious.
I follow because immunistation will give the body a strength to fight a war against the viruses. II does not follow because of the wording ''if the body loses the war''.
I does not follow because of the word 'certainly'. II is obvious.
Because of I the entire world takes interest in presidential election in America. II can't be concluded.
As bank strikes cause severe inconvenience to the pubic and business community it can be concluded that bank come under essential service . Hence II follows. The reason of strike can't be determined from the given statement. Hence I does not follow.
Pirated software has been specifically linked to the not-so-rich. Hence I follows. And what can be the reason for distinction between the rich and the not-so-rich ? Cost seems to be the distinguisting factor.Hence II follows.
Why would a user prefer a particular product? Either because it is cheap (conclusion I) or because it is superior in quality (conclusion II).
It is only because of II that they are withdrawing from UN peacekeeping missions. I does not follow.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.