I may or may not be true but II is obvious because of the last part of the statement.
I is not true because of the wording''....and no person who is entirely free from evil.'' II is obvious.
I follow because immunistation will give the body a strength to fight a war against the viruses. II does not follow because of the wording ''if the body loses the war''.
I does not follow because of the word 'certainly'. II is obvious.
I does not follow because '' senior players'' is no category in the statement. II does not follow because ''more'' does not compare the two categories of players. The statement merely implies that first-class players should get more than what they do at present.
I is obvious, but II is uncertain.
It is true that if calamities are''a regular event''. they must strike every few years. But floods are not the only calamity. The calamity may strike in the form of drought, earthquake, etc. Hence I does not follow. II does not follow because scientific expertise is not the only problem; the trouble may be with implementation.
I follows because people generally make such transformations keeping in mind the taste of the people. II does not follow because sweet may have lose their glory not because of sugar (in fact, chocolates are in vogue in spite of sugar content) but because of changing taste.
Because of I the entire world takes interest in presidential election in America. II can't be concluded.
As bank strikes cause severe inconvenience to the pubic and business community it can be concluded that bank come under essential service . Hence II follows. The reason of strike can't be determined from the given statement. Hence I does not follow.
Pirated software has been specifically linked to the not-so-rich. Hence I follows. And what can be the reason for distinction between the rich and the not-so-rich ? Cost seems to be the distinguisting factor.Hence II follows.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.