I follows because additional amount will lead to road infrastructure, which in turn will lead to industrial growth. II does not follow. Will this additional amount go to NHDP? Or will it be used for alternative road projects? If the statement had answered the formed question s 'Yes', than we could have concluded II with certainty.
The pattern of the number series is as given below ;
8 + 2 = 10
10 + 8 (= 2 x 3 + 2) = 18
18 + 26(= 3 x 8 + 2) = 44
44 + 80 (= 3 x 26 + 2) = 124
124 + 424 (= 3 x 80 + 2) = 366
The statement is of the type 'either A or B'.
I is strong because it explains how the move is furitful for citizens. II is weak because it is based on the misinterpretation of the definition of human right.
As, 100 : 121 or 102 : 112
144 : 169
? 122 : 112
'Cricket' is played on 'pitch' . Similarly, 'Wresting is done in ' Arena' .
First control the flow /movement of the second.
If we interchange the signs 'x' and '÷' the equation becomes
16 + 4 x 2 - 21 ÷ 7 = 16 + 8 - 3 = 21
Silly mistakes always not bad and if somebody pointed out about This we should feel thankful.
Such a warning is usually given to the workers to threaten them that they would lose their job and income forever if they didn't mend their ways. So, only II is implicit.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.