The statement merely says that hole in the ozone layer over Antartica is shrinking. The statement gives no clue about the comparison of rate of release of CFCs atmosphere and removal of CFCs from the atmosphere. Hence, I does not follow. The hole in ozone-depleting elements. But shrinkage of the hole does not imply II necessarily. Hence II does not follow.
From Statement I, cloudy > more windy > sunny
From Statement II, cloudy >more windy > foggy
From both statements, we conclude that foggy days and sunny days tend to be less windy than cloudy days.
Clearly, Conclusions I follows. Hybrid plants are resistant to fungus and hence the life-span of hybrid plants is greater.
I is valid as the statement discusses about dowry and bride-burning . II is valid because if punishment was hard enough, the such ill practice would not have happened.
It is given in the statement that computer revolution is taking place quietly and is a likely organization of the Government which means that computerization is being done rapidly Hence, I is valid and II is invalid.
Team may consist of the number of spinners more or less than that given in Conclusion I. Hence, Conclusion I does not follow. Secondly, it is not known from the statement that opening batsmen were spinners. Hence, Conclusion II does not follow.
We do not have complete idea regarding the context of the statement made by the speaker. Hence, I can' t be correlated with the statement. II follows from the tone of the statement. Why will a young person deliver such a statement?
I does not follow because the statement does not say about the reasons behind women's backwardness. Now see the word 'poverty' used in conclusion II. it can't be correlated with the statement. Hence, conclusion II does not follow.
The given instruction implies I. Hence,conclusion I follows. But conclusion II obviously does not follow.
Local currencies rating plays a pivotal role in stock and foreign exchange market as well as overseas borrowing. Hence conclusion I follows. Conclusion II does not necessarily follow because the given revelation is not enough.
I is obvious from the statement. But the words ' equal effected' used in conclusion II can't be correlated with the statement. Hence, conclusion II does not follow.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.