Anand comes on a bicycle which is not used by any teacher. Hence, Anand cannot be a teacher. therefore, I is valid. II is not valid because if Anand is not a teacher, he is either a students or a staff member.
We are arrive at the conclusion by combining three pieces of information given in the three statements.
Neither conclusion I nor II is implicit in the statement. Any person can be philanthropist whether he is rich or poor.
Conclusions I & II both follows.
Conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II does not follows.
Growth and development of human organism is a continuous process. Some changes takes place in human body now and then. therefore neither and then, Therefore neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Presence of word 'most' in the statement makes both I and II ambiguous. hence, none of I and II can be drawn.
I does not make any connection with the given statement, but II does. Hence, I cannot be drawn but II can be.
fruits ? B-Complex ? good for health
I cannot be concluded because of the presence of world "all" in it. II is the obvious choice from both the statements.
I is invalid as export is not the subject of discussion in the given statement. II is a valid conclusion because there has been increase in production of two wheelers with improved qualities.
Neither of the conclusion follows from the given statement.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.