Neither conclusion I nor II is implicit in the statement. Any person can be philanthropist whether he is rich or poor.
Conclusions I & II both follows.
Conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II does not follows.
Growth and development of human organism is a continuous process. Some changes takes place in human body now and then. therefore neither and then, Therefore neither conclusion I nor II follows.
From the statement, it is deduced that anyone getting commissioned in civil services is guaranteed to get IAS or IPS.
From the statements it is clear that knowledge is interdisciplinary. Thus, Conclusion I follows.
We are arrive at the conclusion by combining three pieces of information given in the three statements.
Anand comes on a bicycle which is not used by any teacher. Hence, Anand cannot be a teacher. therefore, I is valid. II is not valid because if Anand is not a teacher, he is either a students or a staff member.
Presence of word 'most' in the statement makes both I and II ambiguous. hence, none of I and II can be drawn.
I does not make any connection with the given statement, but II does. Hence, I cannot be drawn but II can be.
fruits ? B-Complex ? good for health
I cannot be concluded because of the presence of world "all" in it. II is the obvious choice from both the statements.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.