Conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II does not follows.
Growth and development of human organism is a continuous process. Some changes takes place in human body now and then. therefore neither and then, Therefore neither conclusion I nor II follows.
From the statement, it is deduced that anyone getting commissioned in civil services is guaranteed to get IAS or IPS.
From the statements it is clear that knowledge is interdisciplinary. Thus, Conclusion I follows.
Since killing still continues, the terrorists may not have dome to an understanding with the Government.
Only Conclusion II follows. As the workers feel motived when they get sense of involvement by participating in the management of companies, so they should be allowed to participate.
Conclusions I & II both follows.
Neither conclusion I nor II is implicit in the statement. Any person can be philanthropist whether he is rich or poor.
We are arrive at the conclusion by combining three pieces of information given in the three statements.
Anand comes on a bicycle which is not used by any teacher. Hence, Anand cannot be a teacher. therefore, I is valid. II is not valid because if Anand is not a teacher, he is either a students or a staff member.
Presence of word 'most' in the statement makes both I and II ambiguous. hence, none of I and II can be drawn.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.