The popularity of ayurvedic or allopathic medicines in India in not being talked about in the statement.
So, neither I nor II follow.
It is mentioned in the statement that a neurotic is a person who behaves stupidly. So, Conclusion I follows. The behavior of normal persons cannot be deduced from the given statement. So Conclusion II does not follow.
The given statement does not tell anything about life. it only tells about problems and the way to escape from them. Hence, Conclusion II follows.
In the statement it is said that morning walks are good for health. But it does not mean that all the healthy person go for morning walks. Hence, Conclusion I does not follow. Also, nothing is said about the evening walks in statement Thus, Conclusion II also does not follow.
According to the statement, only those who tackle situation bravely achieve success. So, Conclusion I follows, however Conclusion II is ambiguous with concern to the given statement and so does not follow.
According to the statement, good wranglers are wise-men But it doesn't mean that all wise-men are good wranglers. So, neither I not II follows.
I follows because trees are a part of forest and India's economy depends mainly on forest. II is not correlated with the statement. So it does not follow.
Hence, Statement I follows.
Neither Conclusion I nor II follows. Sun is the source of light, it does not imply that light has only one source.
Here, only Conclusion II follows because this statement is a quote given by the Greek philosopher Socrates which means that knowledge of word is too vast to be explored by a single person.
None of the conclusions follows. 'Animals live on oxygen' does not imply that other things do not need oxygen.
Any written piece is recognised as song when it is sung by a singer. Therefore, only conclusion 1 follows.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.