According to the statement, only those who tackle situation bravely achieve success. So, Conclusion I follows, however Conclusion II is ambiguous with concern to the given statement and so does not follow.
According to the statement, good wranglers are wise-men But it doesn't mean that all wise-men are good wranglers. So, neither I not II follows.
The statement says that greatest need in India is not for sophisticated gadgets but for programmes but this does not mean that there is an adequate number of sophisticated cannot be concluded that emphasis is being laid on procuring sophisticated gadgets. Hence, none of the conclusions follows.
Conclusions I and II convey almost the same meaning that principles related to Ethics and Morality seem to be good but are not practicable in real life. Hence, both the conclusions follow.
Conclusion I is invalid conclusion as relation between Hari and shyam is not given. Conclusion II is valid because if Hari is the son of Suresh, then Suresh will definitely be the father of Hari.
Conclusion I is totally unrelated to the statement and Conclusion II is contrary to the statement. Hence, none of the conclusions follows.
In the statement it is said that morning walks are good for health. But it does not mean that all the healthy person go for morning walks. Hence, Conclusion I does not follow. Also, nothing is said about the evening walks in statement Thus, Conclusion II also does not follow.
The given statement does not tell anything about life. it only tells about problems and the way to escape from them. Hence, Conclusion II follows.
It is mentioned in the statement that a neurotic is a person who behaves stupidly. So, Conclusion I follows. The behavior of normal persons cannot be deduced from the given statement. So Conclusion II does not follow.
The popularity of ayurvedic or allopathic medicines in India in not being talked about in the statement.
So, neither I nor II follow.
I follows because trees are a part of forest and India's economy depends mainly on forest. II is not correlated with the statement. So it does not follow.
Hence, Statement I follows.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.