Nuclear explosion is not the result of the favor by the citizens. Hence conclusion I does not follow. However increase in the international opposition is due to the fact that some powerful nations don't want that others may became powerful.
Conclusion I is obvious from the given statement. Conclusion II is a invalid conclusion because availability of competent tenders has not been mentioned.
Prostitution is not the only reason of AIDS. it is one of the main reason of this disease. Hence, banning only prostitution cannot work 100% to control this disease. it means other factor must be considered also.Therefore, II is a valid conclusion. Conclusion I is invalid as it has not been discussed in the statement that AIDS is curable or not.
Only Conclusion I follows because funding along with other factors can improve quality of education but funding alone cannot guarantee the enhancement of quality of education.
A friends who offers help in the time of need is a true friend. The use of them 'all' in Conclusions I makes it invalid. Conclusion II does not express the inherent meaning of the statement. Therefore, neither Conclusion I nor II follows.
Both the conclusions are not related to the statement. hence, neither I nor II follows
From the commitment of the present Government, it cannot be concluded that former government did not do anything serious about the development nor does it mean that present Government will not do anything for the development of other sectors, hence none of the conclusion follows.
Pakistan's ability to manufacture arms is not being talked about in the statement. So Conclusion I does not follow. The fact Conclusion II cannot be deduced from the statement. So, Conclusions II also doesn't not follow.
it is given in the statement that most of the laborers belonging to unorganized sector earn very low and uncertain income, it means that there are some laborers who earn regular and certain income. Hence, Conclusion II definitely follows from the statement.
none follow as the given statement merely says that camels are very useful for desert. it does not state whether they are chip or available in large number
Both the conclusion follow from the statement. Conclusion I is the direct result of the statement. Conclusion II follows because in the given statement, there is a need to replace the present system with a new one.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.