Both the conclusions are not related to the statement. hence, neither I nor II follows
Fom the statements it is clear that knowledge is interdiciplilnary. Thus, Conclusion I follows.
The second statement clearly corroborates the Conclusion II.
Neither Conclusions I nor II follows. Overpopulation is a result of several factors. Therefore, only unscientific thinking can not be held responsible for overpopulation.
From both the statements it is clear that Conclusion I is true.
If player is found guilty of doping, , his medal is confiscated. therefore, only Conclusion II follows.
A friends who offers help in the time of need is a true friend. The use of them 'all' in Conclusions I makes it invalid. Conclusion II does not express the inherent meaning of the statement. Therefore, neither Conclusion I nor II follows.
Only Conclusion I follows because funding along with other factors can improve quality of education but funding alone cannot guarantee the enhancement of quality of education.
Prostitution is not the only reason of AIDS. it is one of the main reason of this disease. Hence, banning only prostitution cannot work 100% to control this disease. it means other factor must be considered also.Therefore, II is a valid conclusion. Conclusion I is invalid as it has not been discussed in the statement that AIDS is curable or not.
Conclusion I is obvious from the given statement. Conclusion II is a invalid conclusion because availability of competent tenders has not been mentioned.
Nuclear explosion is not the result of the favor by the citizens. Hence conclusion I does not follow. However increase in the international opposition is due to the fact that some powerful nations don't want that others may became powerful.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.