Neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Neither statement I nor II can be drawn the stated facts.
All the students in my class are intelligent and Sunil is not intelligent .So, Sunil is not student of my class.
Only conclusion I follows as the person who emphasized the need to replace the present training program by other method, to bring out the real merit of the managers.
Safety lockers are the best place to preserve valuables, it doesn't mean that valuables can not be preserved at any other place thus, Conclusion I does not follow. Conclusion II is opposite to the statement.
According to the statement, tenders are invited from contractors experienced in executing construction jobs. So, Conclusion I follows. The availability of competent tenderer s in construction is not mentioned. So Conclusion II does not follows.
From the given statements,
"Leaders are human beings"
and " All human beings need rest"
"leaders need rest" follows
From the above two statements it is not clear that parliament can assure the fundamental right.
As Kishan and Chander were arrested amonghst them. So, they must be guilty politicians.
Since above third floor, the building will have lift. So, Conclusion (b) follows.
Both (b) and (C) follow as minister have cars and come to public functions
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.