Neither statement I nor II can be drawn the stated facts.
All the students in my class are intelligent and Sunil is not intelligent .So, Sunil is not student of my class.
Only conclusion I follows as the person who emphasized the need to replace the present training program by other method, to bring out the real merit of the managers.
Safety lockers are the best place to preserve valuables, it doesn't mean that valuables can not be preserved at any other place thus, Conclusion I does not follow. Conclusion II is opposite to the statement.
According to the statement, tenders are invited from contractors experienced in executing construction jobs. So, Conclusion I follows. The availability of competent tenderer s in construction is not mentioned. So Conclusion II does not follows.
Clearly, the statement declares that the dowry is an evil practice and reflects its demerits. Thus, Conclusion I follows. Also it is given that those who take dowry, dishonor womanhood. This implies that those who do not take dowry respect womanhood. So, conclusion II follows.
Neither conclusion I nor II follows.
From the given statements,
"Leaders are human beings"
and " All human beings need rest"
"leaders need rest" follows
From the above two statements it is not clear that parliament can assure the fundamental right.
As Kishan and Chander were arrested amonghst them. So, they must be guilty politicians.
Since above third floor, the building will have lift. So, Conclusion (b) follows.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.