According to the statement, tenders are invited from contractors experienced in executing construction jobs. So, Conclusion I follows. The availability of competent tenderer s in construction is not mentioned. So Conclusion II does not follows.
Clearly, the statement declares that the dowry is an evil practice and reflects its demerits. Thus, Conclusion I follows. Also it is given that those who take dowry, dishonor womanhood. This implies that those who do not take dowry respect womanhood. So, conclusion II follows.
As given in the condition in the statement, the actor either will take the full payment for his recent show or will not take any money for the same. Hence, either of ,the conclusion follows.
Conclusion I does not follow because removal of on indiscipline students does not provide a reasonable solution to the problem. Conclusion II is not related to the statement. Hence, both the conclusion do not follow.
Conclusion I and II convey almost the same meaning that principles related to Ethics and Morality seem to be good but are not practicable in real life. Hence, both the conclusion follow.
Both the conclusion follow. The waiver is incorporated because some of student for MA will have previous experience and some of the students will not have previous experience of social work.
Safety lockers are the best place to preserve valuables, it doesn't mean that valuables can not be preserved at any other place thus, Conclusion I does not follow. Conclusion II is opposite to the statement.
Only conclusion I follows as the person who emphasized the need to replace the present training program by other method, to bring out the real merit of the managers.
All the students in my class are intelligent and Sunil is not intelligent .So, Sunil is not student of my class.
Neither statement I nor II can be drawn the stated facts.
Neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.