Both the conclusion follow the statement as both correctly explain the given statement.
Only conclusion, 'Parents have an obsessive passion for a perfect development of their children thought good schooling.
Conclusion I and II both are follow because both are related to the statement given.
Only Conclusion II is wrong which isn't related to statement.
Only conclusion II follows because the nation will not be able to provide a decent living to its citizens cause of the increasing population of our nation.
Only Conclusion I follows because funding can improve quality of education along with other factors but funding alone cannot guarantee the enhancement of quality of education.
The statement says that greatest need in India is not for sophisticated gadgets but for programmers but this does not mean that there is an adequate number of sophisticated gadgets. Secondly, there is a need for programmers but it cannot be concluded that emphasis is being laid on procuring sophisticated gadgets. Hence, none of the conclusion follow.
It is clear from the statement that a product of company 'X' has good quality and is also available at a reasonable price. Hence, both the conclusion follow.
Both the conclusion follow. The waiver is incorporated because some of student for MA will have previous experience and some of the students will not have previous experience of social work.
Conclusion I and II convey almost the same meaning that principles related to Ethics and Morality seem to be good but are not practicable in real life. Hence, both the conclusion follow.
Conclusion I does not follow because removal of on indiscipline students does not provide a reasonable solution to the problem. Conclusion II is not related to the statement. Hence, both the conclusion do not follow.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.