The second conclusion is an irrational inference, But first conclusion is correct as it is impossible for a country to grow and produce all that it needs.
Of all the TV sets manufactured in India, 'Solar' brand has the largest sale' , it can be said only when volume of sales of all brands of TV sets manufactured is know. thus, Conclusion I follows. Nothing can be said about conclusion II as we don't have any information about the production of different brands of TV.
Clearly, people have many weaknesses, smoking is one of them. But it is not true that if a person desires to give up smoking he is not able to do it. Hence , only II is true.
The use of term 'All' in the conclusion I makes it invalid. We know that, definite conclusion cannot be drawn from general statement.
Ministers arrived at the public function in their cars. Thus. ministers have cars and they attended public function. Therefore, only II and III are implicit in the statement.
It is not necessary that A is a clerk though he is poor.
James gets paid for his work.
From the statement, we can clearly say that 'A' glass of wine will cure the woman suffering from breast cancer' .
From the statement, we Clearly say that 'India' is country of people with diverse cultures, different language and different social and economic setups' .
Neither Conclusion I nor II follows.
As per Conclusion I, healthy people don't need medicine is right but even, then people keep medicine in their home is also right.
Hence, both Conclusion I and II follows.
The conclusion that follows the statement is Conclusion II because the only way escape the problem is to face it.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.