II is for the immediate future, III is for some time ahead I does not follow because of the word "immediately"
I is the right course. I and III would create a bigger problem. Viz pollution.
I and III would be too harsh. II is absurd efforts should be made to supervise the quality of the food prepared by the canteen
A proper course of action would be serving notices to these clubs to behave themselves. Even police personnel may be deployed, but only during the sensitive hours.
Company A should inspect the rejected valves to ensure, if they are really substandard. If yes, it should scrutinise its working throughly and remove its lackings. Company A should inform company X that steps have been taken for improvement and renegotiate the schedule of supply.
The statement describes the problem of admission in colleges faced by students. Both the courses of action I and III are the right steps towards providing solution of this problem.
I would be punishing the brave. II is absurd, how can city fights be diverted" only III makes sense.
Suspension of officer-in charge dose not immediately help the situation nor does the charge of machinery help in any way to tackle the present situation. Only II can solve the present crisis.
Action I and III will create another problems action II is the effective way to reduce the problem.
Since the basic problem is that number of admission seeders are much more than the available seats hence course of action I and II will help to reduce the problem.
Clearly either II or III action solve the problem.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.