I follows because holding the elections at this juncture would render the exercise meaningless, II follows for 'heavy damage'.
I is invalid because of being an extreme action. II is a proper corrective measure.
Implementation of such action plans as framed by the conference is a right course of action as it will give an immediate and effective impact on the standard of education for the children.
The problem faced by the airlines and cargo agents is the non-availability of cargo space. Therefore, right course of action is to combat the problem.
I follows as a measure of caution, But II wont solve the problem and poor electrical fittings would wreak havoc where ever the market be.
If the Government goes for I, it would impinge on the autonomy of the private sector.
None focuses on the real reason of unemployability.
Only by increasing our agricultural production, we can have a better position in international agricultural trade. Reduction in non agricultural commodities will further worsen our position. So, only I is the right course of action.
As in the given statements, India is already endowed with tourist spots. Therefore, The exiting potential should be exploited.
Obviously, if Government has decided to stop financial support to voluntary organizations, these organizations should find other sources of financial support. Hence II is valid.
Both are the right courses of action for effective implementation of computer education at primary level in urban and rural schools.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.