I follows as a measure of caution, But II wont solve the problem and poor electrical fittings would wreak havoc where ever the market be.
If the Government goes for I, it would impinge on the autonomy of the private sector.
Motormen should not be made the scapegoat for the failure of the signalling system.
I is simply absurd. But even II is not the solution.
I is the obvious course of action. But II is absurd punishment for thieves in understandable. But how can you punish "all the student"?
I is impractical. . .Water is essential for life to go on. II is sensible, especially when using ground water is proving to be uneconomical.
The problem faced by the airlines and cargo agents is the non-availability of cargo space. Therefore, right course of action is to combat the problem.
Implementation of such action plans as framed by the conference is a right course of action as it will give an immediate and effective impact on the standard of education for the children.
I is invalid because of being an extreme action. II is a proper corrective measure.
I follows because holding the elections at this juncture would render the exercise meaningless, II follows for 'heavy damage'.
None focuses on the real reason of unemployability.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.