Motormen should not be made the scapegoat for the failure of the signalling system.
Both of these are extreme action.
II is the immediate course of action while I can be implemented a bit later.
Both are extreme courses of action.
if the rainfall is normal. It does not mean we would deprive the farmers of his due.The action may be deemed to be correct only if we know that they are the reversal of policies which has been framed during crisis years.
II is an extreme action and hence does not follows. I is a proper course of action. Note that taking immediate steps is not the same immediate removal of the constructions. Which may again have been considered to be extreme courseof the action.
if the govt goes for I, it would impinge on the autonomy of the private sector.
I follows as a measure of caution. But II won't solve the problem: poor electrical fittings would wreak havoc wherever the market be.
I is simply absurd. II follows as a solution to be complicated paperwork.
I is easier said than done. Even I makes sense only when the govt goes for II.
I is impractical. . .Water is essential for life to go on. II is sensible, especially when using ground water is proving to be uneconomical.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.