The management of the university should look into the matter and take strict action against such negligence.
Either the parents or guardians of the defaults should be called for a meeting.
Precautions must be taken in case of to prevent a crisis. Hence, both courses of action I and II will favour the solution.
It is clear that obscene posters create unhealthy imprints on the impressionable fragile minds of children. Banning such poster will definitely have positive results.
It is obvious that both the courses of action are necessary steps and hence both follow.
Main problem according to the statement is delay in judgement. In this case, both courses of action will be beneficial and will improve the judicial process.
All such product should be banned from the market if after a warning also correct information is not provided.
After working with statement, it is found that none of the action is strong.
Main problem according to statement is delay in payment. To reduce wasteful expenditure would definitely be a right step towards solution. Hence, only course of action I will favor the solution.
In the given courses of action, none is strong as the per the question.
Only Conclusions I can follow.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.