I is implicit in the norm prescribed in the sentence. This is why checking is being advised. Again, what would the banks check? Obviously, what the clients reveal. Banks would assume the revelation to be true. Hence I is not implicit. However , II is vague. If cross-checking is what the speaker has in mind II would become implicit.
If the govt has taken the decision. It must have assumed that its implementation would be possible II would not be is implicit because of "produced in the country" it is possible that the govt has import on its mind for the said purpose.
It is not implicit that legal mining does not harm and illegal mining does all harm. It harmful for the environment. This happens because norms are flouted with impunity in illegal mining.
I is implicit in the need for training. But II takes things to an extreme with the phrase "no skill sets".
I is not an assumption because there may be server reasons for the preference being stated. II is implicit because you ask someone to employ a means only when you assume that the means is available.
I is implicit because only then the person checking can check the availability, But II is not implicit. Personal details are generally required at the time of booking tickets.
The statement does not give any clue to the use of language. Hence I is not implicit. II is not implicit because of only.
When we mention something to someone, we assume they know is meaning. Hence I is implicit. But II is not implicit as the details cannot be assumed.
Obviously, 0.7 is one of the types. Hence I is implicit II is also implicit or else statement would make no sense.
If the Government gives allowances to all the unemployed youths, the there will be great loss of money and they will not be think for their future. Hence I doesn't follow. II follows because various schemes in different areas will reduce the unemployment.If the Government and society introduce vocational education, it will also reduce the unemployment. Hence, Course of Action III follows.
Only by increasing our agriciltural production, we can have a better position in international agriciltural trade. Reduction in non-agriciltural commodities will further worsen our position. So, only I is the right course of action.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.