I is a bizarre assumption. The statement does not assume anything about what men or women should (not) do. II is implicit because to become the embodiment of something, much has to be proved first.
I is implicit because advertisement of a particular brand is usually placed in order to compete with other available brands. II is implicit because price and quality are not inextricably related.
If there were no demands for resignation, why would the politician say,'' I will not resign'' ? Hence I is implicit . Again, he talks of being proved guilty. A proof of guilty comes only after the levelling of charges. Hence II is implicit.
Why retain a photograph document ? So that it comes handy in fighting terror. In other words, who knows the buyer may be a terrorism. Hence I is implicit. II is beside the statement .
The person A is certainly assuming that get started one needs some teaching. Hence I is clearly an assumption. But nothing is said about professional photographers' contribution. Hence II is not an assumption.
I is rejected because nothing has been told about technical expertise .The advertisement must have been targeted at the people who want to be successful photographer. Hence II is an assumption.
I is not an assumption but an inference. II is implicit because unless one is destructive, one cannot destroy something.
I is implicit because the power to reject something is usually possible only when one has the power to grant it.
II has no connection whatsoever with the statement.
If A needs to be substituted by B, we assume that B is more appropriate than A. Now, the appropriateness of sledgehammer may be due to either of the following reasons: (a) a sledgehammer is more powerful; (b) though not more powerful, it works because different tools are required in different conditions. (b) may be explained by the following example : A chalk can not be said to be more powerful than a pen. But when it comes to writing on a blackboard, you would use a chalk, not a pen.
I is not implicit: Since the statement is silent on whether the move would have a good or a bad impact, it does not make any assumption about the move's desirability. II is also not implicit . In fact the assumption is on the contrary. If we say that this move has been taken from a particular point of view ( that of exchange rate management), We assume that other moves are also possible.
A decision is taken when it is felt that it would be accepted by most of the people concerned. Hence I is implicit. II is also implicit as the reason behind the need.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.