The increase would make no sense without passengers. Hence, Assumption I is implicit. Assumption II may be a probable reason but not a necessary one for the increase Hence, II is invalid.
Assumptions II and III are implicit. According to II, those who have secured 65% marks may not perform well in the job and according to Assumption III those who have secured 65% or more marks are likely to perform well. Hence, those with atleast 65% marks are eligible to apply for the post.
The situation is tense. It means that some serious incident has occurred, Hence, Assumption I is implicit. secondly, it is given that situation still continues to be the tense and people have been requested to be inside home. Hence, Assumption II is implicit. Assumption III is rubbish and has no relation with the given statement. Hence, III is an invalid assumption.
Training has been necessitated in the statement, i.e., it is related to the efficiency and effectiveness of an employee. Therefor, both the Assumptions I and II are implicit in the statement.
Assumptions I and II are implicit because the warning against leaning out suggests one to be careful are against the dangers involved. No doubts that ensuring the passengers safety is the responsibility of the railways authorities ans hence III is also a valid assumption.
None of the statements is implicit in the statement . Rich people are more prone to a have heart attacks. It does not imply that most of the deaths caused among rich people are due to the heart attack. Again, the statement does not imply that poor people do not have heart attacks.
We do not hold a function without being ready for the preparation. Hence, Assumption I is a valid assumption. Assumption II is also valid as when you invited someone, you assume that he will come.
Assumption I is invalid because it has no relation with the statement. Assumption II is implicit as prices have been slashed with assumption that sales will increase thus leading to profit.
Assumption I is implicit because without this assumption Mohan would not have said to prepare food for almost all his friends. Assumption II is invalid as about 30 implies "nearly 30, may be a few less, may be a few more."
The word "All" makes I invalid but II is implicit as applicants assume a fair selection process.
When an order is passed, it is assumed that people will comply with it. Hence, Assumption I is valid. II is not implicit as such an assumption makes the given statement invalid because of its negativity.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.