Both assumption are implicit.
Both assumption are not true as per the statement, so they are not implicit
Assumption I and II are not implicit.
According to statement, the assumption, "some schools admit children who are below five years of age" is implicit.
Assumption, 'trains service are reasonably good in Paris. The only assumption according to statement.
Assumption II follows, cause of people living in rural areas are not below the poverty line.
Assumptions l and ll are complicit as penalty is a type as off punishment. To avoid people will start paying bill on time and money collected may offset the losses gained due to delayed payment.
Assumption l is just opposite of truth
ll is not implicit not by the engineer's statement no hint of previous planning is given.
Assumption l is implicit is not implicit, ll is not implicit. As it is vague. III is implicit as advertisement are given with the hope that people would come into know the qualities of the product and buy it.
The woman asks God to help her, if her intention have been pure. But this does not imply that God would not have helped her if intention were not pure. Hence, only Assumption III is implicit
This advertisement is given as people travel to Europe There are other agencies also (clear from word ' our agency'). But III does not clarify that after this advertisement people may go to other agencies
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.