Both assumption are not true as per the statement, so they are not implicit
Assumption I and II are not implicit.
According to statement, the assumption, "some schools admit children who are below five years of age" is implicit.
Assumption, 'trains service are reasonably good in Paris. The only assumption according to statement.
Assumption II follows, cause of people living in rural areas are not below the poverty line.
Clearly, penalty will be imposed for improper use, so it is clear some people misuses the chain. Hence, both the Assumptions I and II are implicit.
Both assumption are implicit.
Assumptions l and ll are complicit as penalty is a type as off punishment. To avoid people will start paying bill on time and money collected may offset the losses gained due to delayed payment.
Assumption l is just opposite of truth
ll is not implicit not by the engineer's statement no hint of previous planning is given.
Assumption l is implicit is not implicit, ll is not implicit. As it is vague. III is implicit as advertisement are given with the hope that people would come into know the qualities of the product and buy it.
The woman asks God to help her, if her intention have been pure. But this does not imply that God would not have helped her if intention were not pure. Hence, only Assumption III is implicit
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.