According to statement, the assumption, "some schools admit children who are below five years of age" is implicit.
Assumption, 'trains service are reasonably good in Paris. The only assumption according to statement.
Assumption II follows, cause of people living in rural areas are not below the poverty line.
Clearly, penalty will be imposed for improper use, so it is clear some people misuses the chain. Hence, both the Assumptions I and II are implicit.
Clearly the function will start as per the scheduled. Hence, only Assumption II is implicit
Both the Assumption I and ll are implicit as some of instruction have been given in writing to prevent change of claim of reimbursement for traveling expenses. Also, expenses are paid by other organizations.
Assumption I and II are not implicit.
Both assumption are not true as per the statement, so they are not implicit
Both assumption are implicit.
Assumptions l and ll are complicit as penalty is a type as off punishment. To avoid people will start paying bill on time and money collected may offset the losses gained due to delayed payment.
Assumption l is just opposite of truth
ll is not implicit not by the engineer's statement no hint of previous planning is given.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.